Comparison of valganciclovir versus foscarnet for the treatment of cytomegalovirus viremia in adult acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation increases treatment-related mortality (TRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We analyzed 141 adult acute leukemia (AL) patients suffered allo-HCT between 2017 and 2021, who developed CMV viremia post-HCT and treated with valganciclovir or foscarnet, to evaluate effectiveness and safety of both drugs. Viremia clearance rates (14 and 21 d post treatment) and toxicities were similar in two groups. However, valganciclovir was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of CMV recurrence within 180 days (16.7% vs. 35.7%, p=0.029) post CMV clearance. Finally, 2-year TRM was lower in valganciclovir group (9.7% ± 0.2% vs. 26.2% ± 0.3%, p = 0.026), result a superior 2-year overall survival (OS; 88.1% ± 5.2% vs. 64.4% ± 5.5%, p = 0.005) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; 82.0% ± 5.9% vs. 58.9% ± 5.6%, p = 0.009). Valganciclovir might decrease CMV viremia recurrence and led to better long-term outcome than foscarnet in adult AL patients developed CMV viremia post-HCT. Considering the inherent biases of retrospective study, well-designed trials are warranted to validate our conclusion.

Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Inhibitor SHR2554 in Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: Data from the First-in-Human Phase I Study.

PURPOSE: Patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) setting have only a limited number of therapies available, and the prognosis is extremely poor. SHR2554 is an oral inhibitor against EZH2, a rational therapeutic target for lymphomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, two-part, phase I study of SHR2554 in r/r mature lymphoid neoplasms. In part I, 350 mg twice daily was established as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on the findings during dose escalation and expansion; subsequently, selected lymphoma subtypes were recruited in clinical expansion cohorts to receive SHR2554 at RP2D. Here, we provide an in-depth assessment of SHR2554 at RP2D in subpopulation with r/r PTCL. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included for analysis (17 angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and 11 not otherwise specified). Eighteen (64%) patients had received ≥2 lines of previous anticancer therapies. The objective response rate was 61% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-78]. Responses were still ongoing in 59% (10/17) of the responders; estimated median duration of response was 12.3 months (95% CI, 7.4-not reached). Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 5.3-22.0), and 12-month overall survival rate was 92% (95% CI, 72-98). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased platelet count [nine (32%)] as well as decreased white blood cell count, decreased neutrophil count, and anemia [four (14%) for each]. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This extended follow-up analysis further supports SHR2554 as a therapeutic opportunity for patients with r/r PTCL.

Long-term outcomes with HLX01 (HanliKang®), a rituximab biosimilar, in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 5-year follow-up results of the phase 3 HLX01-NHL03 study.

HLX01 (HanliKang®) is a rituximab biosimilar that showed bioequivalence to reference rituximab in untreated CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the phase 3 HLX01-NHL03 study. Here, we report the 5-year follow-up results from the open-label extension part. Patients were randomised to either rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or HLX01 plus CHOP (H-CHOP) every 21 days for up to six cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Of the 407 patients enrolled in HLX01-NHL03, 316 patients (H-CHOP = 157; R-CHOP = 159) were included in the 5-year follow-up for a median duration of 65.1 (range, 2.2-76.5) months. 96.5% of the patients had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 1 or 2, and 17.7% had bone marrow involvement. The 5-year OS rates were 81.0% (95% CI: 74.9-87.5%) and 75.4% (95% CI: 68.9-82.6%)( HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.47-1.20; p = 0.23) while 5-year PFS rates were 77.7% (95% CI: 71.4-84.6%) and 73.0% (95% CI: 66.3-80.3%) (HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.30; p = 0.43) in the H-CHOP and R-CHOP groups, respectively. Treatment outcomes did not differ between groups regardless of IPI score and were consistent with the primary analysis. H-CHOP and R-CHOP provided no significant difference in 5-year OS or PFS in previously untreated patients with low or low-intermediate risk DLBCL.

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in R/R DLBCL patients with failure of CAR-T therapy.

From October 2017 to June 2022, we retrospectively report outcomes of R/R DLBCL patients with failure of CAR-T therapy, then receiving allo-HSCT. Among 10 patients, 5 were males and 5 females, with a median age of 43.5 (27-52) years. All patients were diagnosed refractory/relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The median time from CAR-T treatment to transplantation was 84.5 (31-370) days. The median follow-up was 21 (3-69) months. 5/10 patients attained CR and 1/10 patient attained PR during the follow up. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60%. The 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 70% and 40%, respectively. At the time of the analysis, 6 patients were still living. During the follow up, four patients have died and the causes were disease relapses and progressions (2 patients), acute renal failure (1 patient), severe pulmonary infection (1 patient). Non-relapse was 20.0%.

Circulating tumor DNA determining hyperprogressive disease after CAR-T therapy alarms in DLBCL: a case report and literature review.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has been widely applied in the clinical practice of relapse/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) due to its promising effects. Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) has gained attention for rapid tumor progression and has become a therapeutic and prognostic challenge. Here, we present a patient who had suffered from several recurrences previously and controlled well with a very small tumor lesion left was infused with CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T, with no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, or cytokine release syndrome observed. However, rapid deterioration, subsequent imaging examination, circulating tumor DNA, and serum biomarkers detection identified HPD. The patient did not respond to salvage treatment and died 40 days after infusion. To our knowledge, only one case of HPD in DLBCL after CAR-T therapy has been reported. This fatal case alarmed the risk of HPD and the ctDNA profile monitoring we used was performed as a non-invasive method to diagnose HPD, providing far-reaching practical instruction for CAR-T therapy.

Body mass index-associated responses to an ABVD-like regimen in newly-diagnosed patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Background: The role of body mass index (BMI) in the treatment outcomes of lymphoma patients is controversial. While investigating the efficacy of ABVD-like regimen in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, we observed that obese patients had poor responses. To better understand this clinical phenomenon, we evaluated the effect of BMI on responses to ABVD-like chemotherapy in HL patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the clinical outcomes of all 67 patients with confirmed HL who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from November 2016 to March 2023 with an ABVD-like regimen as first-line chemotherapy. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared across different BMI categories. The primary end-point was the overall response rate defined as the proportion of the HL patients who achieved complete response or partial response. The additional end-points included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: The median age of the HL patients was 31 years old. Of the patients, 10.4% were obese, and 17.9% patients were overweight. Interim and end-term response evaluations revealed overall response rates of 98.5% and 83.6%, respectively. The proportion of patients with potential poor prognostic factors (IPS risk factors) did not differ significantly in the responders versus non-responders. However, non-responders had a higher average BMI when compared with responders (p = 0.002). Poor overall response rates in higher BMI patients indeed manifested with shorter progression free survival (p = 0.013). The minimum relative dose of the ABVD-like regimen in the overweight and obese groups was significantly lower than in the normal weight group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our analyses show that >80% of newly-diagnosed HL patients responded to the ABVD-like regimen. We find that being obese or overweight at the time of diagnosis correlated with a poorer overall response rate and that BMI was an independent risk factor in HL patients treated with the ABVD-like regimen. Lower doses of ABVD-like regimen contributed to the discrepant findings of responses in the high BMI groups. These findings indicate that newly-diagnosed, obese HL patients receiving an ABVD-like regimen require personalized treatment.

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with different HBV status: a retrospective study from a single center.

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is an effective salvage treatment in relapsed or refractory(r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has not been studied. Methods and results: Here, 51 patients with r/r DLBCL receiving CAR-T therapy were enrolled and analyzed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The overall response rate and the complete remission rate (CR) of CAR-T therapy were 74.5% and 39.2%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.1 months after CAR-T, the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 36 months were 43.4% and 28.7%, respectively. These patients were divided into three cohorts including chronic HBV infection group (n=6), resolved HBV infection group (n=25) and non-HBV infection group (n=20). Bone marrow involvement was significantly higher in the HBV infection group(P<0.001), other basic characteristics before CAR-T therapy were comparable. Subgroup analysis showed that HBV infection status did not affect the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in CR rate, OS or PFS, and there was no significant difference in CAR-T related toxicities between three cohorts. Only one cirrhosis patient with chronic HBV infection experienced HBV reactivation. Conclusions: CAR-T therapy was effective and can be used safely in r/r DLBCL with HBV infection under proper monitoring and antiviral prophylaxis.

Long-term Complete Remission of Decitabine-Primed Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR-T Therapy with PD-1 and BTK Inhibitors Maintenance in a Refractory Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Patient.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that affects the brain, eyes, cerebrospinal fluid, or spinal cord without systemic involvement. The outcome of patients with PCNSL is worse compared to patients with systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Given potential mortality associated with severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), patients with PCNSL have been excluded from most clinical trials involving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy initially. Here, we report for the first time to apply decitabine-primed tandem CD19/CD22 dual-targeted CAR-T therapy with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors maintenance in one patient with multiline-resistant refractory PCNSL and the patient has maintained complete remission (CR) for a 35-month follow-up period. This case represents the first successful treatment of multiline resistant refractory PCNSL with long-term CR and without inducing ICANS under tandem CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T therapy followed by maintenance therapy with PD-1 and BTK inhibitors. This study shows tremendous potential in the treatment of PCNSL and offers a look toward ongoing clinical studies.

Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy?

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown great success against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tandem and sequential CD19/CD22 dual-target CAR T-cell therapies have been developed to reduce the possibility of CD19-negative relapse; however, the superior strategy is still uncertain. This study screened 219 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL who were enrolled in clinical trials of either CD19 (NCT03919240) or CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy (NCT03614858). The complete remission (CR) rates in the single CD19, tandem CD19/CD22, and sequential CD19/CD22 groups were 83.0% (122/147), 98.0% (50/51), and 95.2% (20/21), respectively (single CD19 vs. tandem CD19/CD22, P = 0.006). Patients with high-risk factors achieved a higher rate of CR in the tandem CD19/CD22 group than in the single CD19 group (100.0% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.017). Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy was one of the significant favorable factors in the multivariate analysis of the CR rate. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the three groups. Multivariable analysis in CR patients showed that a low frequency of relapse, a low tumor burden, minimal residual disease-negative CR and bridging to transplantation were independently associated with better leukemia-free survival. Our findings suggested that tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy obtains a better response than CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and a similar response to sequential CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy.

Efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with HAAG (homoharringtonine, aclarubicin, low-dose cytarabine and G-CSF) for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

The 7 + 3 regimen is the front-line induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia, with a response rate of 60-80%. But it's not suitable for all patients especially old/unfit patients because of a higher treatment related toxicity. Therefore, safer and more effective induction therapies are required. In this retrospective study, 50 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia received decitabine combined with HAAG (homoharringtonine, aclarubicin, low-dose cytarabine and G-CSF) as induction chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) rate was 96% (48/50) and overall response rate was 100%. Of note, All 7 patients harboring FLT3-ITD mutation achieved CR. The median overall survival (OS) was 40.0 months (range 2.0, 58.0). The OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 75.3%, 54.2%, and 49.3%. The median relapse free survival (RFS) was 38.0 months (range 2.0, 58.0). The RFS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 67.3%, 48.9%, and 45.1%. The OS and RFS of patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were significantly higher than those who did not undergo HSCT (p=0.017; 0.016). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 84% and 88%. Meanwhile, the incidence of grade 3-4 infection and bleeding was only 16% and 6%. There was no early death. In conclusion, DAC+HAAG regimen is effective and well-tolerated as induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML.

Decitabine-primed tandem CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as highly effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but only about 40% patients have achieved sustained responses. Here, we conducted a phase II clinical trial testing efficacy and toxicities of CAR-T therapy in R/R non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients (NCT03196830). Among enrolled patients, 33 R/R DLBCL patients pretreated with DFC (decitabine, fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide) lymphodepletion chemotherapy and infused with tandem CD19-CD22 based CAR-T cells were drawn out for efficacy and toxicities of CAR-T therapy evaluation. With a median follow-up of 10.9(0.6-29.0) months, the best overall response and complete remission (CR) rates were 90.9% and 63.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months and overall survival (OS) was undefined. The 2-year OS and PFS rates were 54.3% and 47.2%, respectively. No severe grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed and grade 3 CRS was observed in only 7 patients; 3 patients developed mild immune effect or cell-associated neurotoxic syndrome. All toxicities were transient and reversible and no CAR-T-related mortality. Further subgroup analysis showed that achieving CR was an independent prognostic factor associated with favorable PFS and OS. The 2-year OS and PFS for patients who achieved CR within 3 months (undefined versus undefined P=0.021 and undefined versus undefined P=0.036) or during the follow-up period were significantly longer than those who did not (undefined versus 4.6 months P < 0.0001 and undefined versus 2.0months P<0.001). While severe CRS was also an independent prognostic factor but associated with inferior PFS and OS. The 2-year OS and PFS for patients with grade 3 CRS were significantly shorter than those with grade 0-2 CRS (4.1 months versus undefined P<0.0001 and 1.7 months versus undefined P=0.0002). This study indicated that CD19/CD22 dual-targeted CAR-T therapy under a decitabine-containing lymphodepletion regimen may be a safe, potent effective approach to R/R DLBCL patients.

Comparison of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant With or Without Unrelated Cord Blood Infusion in Severe Aplastic Anemia: Outcomes of a Multicenter Study.

The purpose of this study in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients was to compare the feasibility and efficacy of haploidentical hematological stem cell transplantation combined with a single unrelated cord blood (UCB) infusion (Haplo-cord-HSCT) or haplo-identical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) alone. The five-year graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free or failure-free survival (GFFS) was similar between the two groups (72.4 ± 3.4% vs. 65.4 ± 5.2%, P = 0.178); however, the five-year overall survival (OS) was more favorable in the Haplo-cord-HSCT group than that in the Haplo-HSCT group (84.0 ± 2.8% vs. 72.6 ± 4.9%, P = 0.022), as was transplantation-related mortality (16.4% vs. 27.4%, P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that Haplo-cord HSCT was the only independent determinant of increased OS (P = 0.013). Explorative subgroup analysis showed that only an Human leukocyte antigen-A (HLA-A) allele match between UCB and the recipient was a beneficial factor for GFFS in the Haplo-cord-HSCT group (P = 0.011). In the haplo-cord with an HLA-A match (n = 139) or mismatch (n = 32) or Haplo-HSCT groups, a haplo-cord HLA-A allele match was associated with lower I-IV and III-IV acute GVHD. The haplo-cord with an HLA-A match subgroup also had higher five-year OS than the Haplo-HSCT group (85.4 ± 3.0% vs. 72.6 ± 4.9%, P = 0.013), and higher five-year GFFS than the Haplo-cord HLA-A allele mismatch subgroup (76.2 ± 3.6% vs. 56.3 ± 8.8%, P = 0.011). These findings suggest that the coinfusion of a single UCB potentially improves survival of Haplo-HSCT in SAA patients and that an HLA-A allele-matched UCB is the preferred option.

Dual epigenetic agents plus rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin as salvage treatment in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients failure of salvage chemotherapy.

Refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients' failure of salvage chemotherapy had extremely worse prognoses. Herein, 14 R/R DLBCL patients failed to salvage chemotherapy were exposed to dual epigenetic agents (Chidamide 30 mg biw*2w and Decitabine 10 mg/m2 qd*d1-d5) and sequential R-GemOx (rituximab 375 mg/m2 qd d6; gemcitabine 1 g/m2 d7, d14; and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 d7) for further salvage chemotherapy. Finally, 11/14(78.6%) patients achieved overall response with 6/14(42.9%) achieving complete remission and 2-year overall survival (OS)/progression free survival (PFS) rate was 42.7%, extremely higher than reported previously. Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that 2-year OS/PFS rate was significantly higher in patients achieved complete/partial remission or with low international prognosis index (IPI 0-2) than that in patients with steady disease or high IPI (3-5). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were hematological toxicities. All toxicities were transient and reversible. Our report implicates that combination of dual epigenetic agents and R-GemOx is a safe and promising alternative for R/R DLBCL patients.

Features of Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Acute Leukemia Patients After Haplo-HCT With Myeloablative ATG-Containing Conditioning Regimen.

Background: Haploidentical donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) has become a preferred option for patients without HLA-matched donors, but it increases the risk of viral reactivations. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are common viruses post-HCT, but limited data have been reported in the setting of haplo-HCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study enrolling acute leukemia patients who received haplo-HCT with myeloablative conditioning regimen employing ATG in our center from July 2014 to July 2017. All the patients enrolled were EBV-IgM and EBV-DNA negative but EBV-IgG positive, and so were their donors. The same went for CMV as well. Results: In total, 602 patients were recruited consisting of 331 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 271 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). One-year cumulative incidences of EBV (22.9% ± 2.4% vs. 27.4% ± 2.8%, P = 0.169) and CMV (24.7% ± 2.4% vs. 29.4% ± 2.8%, P = 0.190) reactivation were comparable between AML and ALL. EBV and CMV were independent risk factors for each other. In the AML group, male recipients [HR = 1.275, 95% CI (1.001-1.624), P = 0.049] and acute graft-versus-host disease [HR = 1.592, 95% CI (1.001-2.533), P = 0.049] were independent risk factors for EBV reactivation and CMV reactivation, respectively. CMV rather than EBV reactivation was related to a trend of worsened treatment-related mortality (TRM) (15.6% ± 0.1% vs. 10.2% ± 0.0%, P = 0.067) and progression-free survival (PFS) (60.6% ± 4.1% vs. 70.3% ± 2.3%, P = 0.073), while significant impacts were revealed only in the subgroup analysis. CMV reactivation resulted in a remarkable inferior 2-year overall survival (OS) (64.2% ± 5.7% vs. 77.6% ± 3.2%, P = 0.038) and PFS (55.0% ± 5.9% vs. 71.9% ± 3.4%, P = 0.042) in ALL patients. On the other hand, in the EBV+/CMV- subgroup, relapse was lower in ALL patients (8.2% ± 0.2% vs. 32.4% ± 0.8%, P = 0.010) compared with AML patients, which led to a superior 2-year OS (82.0% ± 6.2% vs. 60.3% ± 8.8%, P = 0.016) and PFS (74.5% ± 7.0% vs. 57.5% ± 8.4%, P = 0.036). Conclusion: We concluded that EBV and CMV reactivations were frequent in acute leukemia patients after haplo-HCT, with possibly distinctive risk factors from HLA-matched HCT. There could be a potential interaction between EBV and CMV, but impacts on transplant outcomes remained complex.

SHR2554, an EZH2 inhibitor, in relapsed or refractory mature lymphoid neoplasms: a first-in-human, dose-escalation, dose-expansion, and clinical expansion phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of EZH2 has a crucial role in lymphomagenesis. We did a first-in-human study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity of SHR2554, an oral EZH2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory mature lymphoid neoplasms, including B-cell lymphomas, T-cell lymphomas, and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: This was a multicentre, dose-escalation, dose-expansion, and clinical expansion phase 1 study done at 13 hospitals in China. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed mature lymphoid neoplasms that had relapsed or were refractory to standard systemic therapies or had no standard-of-care. The study included a dose-escalation phase, at doses of SHR2554 from 50 mg to 800 mg twice daily; a dose-expansion phase, at two selected doses; and a subsequent clinical expansion phase at the recommended phase 2 dose in selected tumours. Primary endpoints were the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and recommended phase 2 dose. Objective response rate was a secondary endpoint. Safety and activity were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of SHR2554 and had at least one post-baseline evaluation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03603951, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 14, 2018, and July 13, 2021, 113 patients received SHR2554. At data cutoff (Sept 10, 2021), the median follow-up duration was 7·0 months (IQR 3·7-12·0). 71 (63%) patients were men and 42 (37%) were women, 110 (97%) were of Han ethnicity and 3 (3%) of other ethnicities, and 53 (47%) had received three or more lines of previous anticancer therapies. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two (67%) of three patients who received 400 mg SHR2554 twice daily and one (17%) of six patients who received 350 mg SHR2554 twice daily. The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 350 mg twice daily. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events in all 113 patients were decreased platelet count (20 [18%]), decreased neutrophil count (ten [9%]), decreased white blood cell count (nine [8%]), and anaemia (seven [6%]). 18 (16%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events. Two patients (2%) died due to treatment-related adverse events: one (1%) due to skin infection and toxic epidermal necrolysis and one (1%) due to respiratory failure. 107 (95%) of the 113 enrolled patients had post-baseline assessments for tumour response and were included in the activity analysis. 46 (43%; 95% CI 33-53) of these 107 patients had an overall response. INTERPRETATION: SHR2554 showed an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumour activity in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas, providing evidence for future investigations. FUNDING: Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Overall survival benefits provided by lenalidomide maintenance after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has achieved remarkable effects in refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, many patients receiving CAR-T therapy still eventually die of disease recurrence or progression due to target antigen loss or exhaustion of CAR-T cells. Therefore, maintaining the efficacy of CAR-T has become a particular research focus. As lenalidomide can regulate T cell function, we conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of lenalidomide maintenance after CAR-T therapy in R/R DLBCL patients. Methods: Seven R/R DLBCL patients who received lenalidomide maintenance after CAR-T therapy and nine DLBCL patients that underwent CAR-T treatment alone were included. The clinical data of all subjects were collected to evaluate the efficacy of lenalidomide maintenance. In order to understand the possible mechanisms of lenalidomide in CAR-T therapy, CAR-T copies of peripheral blood were regularly detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and an in vitro test was also conducted. Results: Overall survival (OS) was significantly prolonged in the lenalidomide maintenance group. Furthermore, one case responding to CAR-T therapy initially but suffering a relapse shortly achieved complete remission again after lenalidomide exposure, with an increase in the number of CAR-T copies detected. The in vitro test showed that lenalidomide could delay the exhaustion of CAR-T cells. Conclusions: Lenalidomide maintenance after CAR-T therapy is a safe and effective choice for R/R DLBCL patients. We confirmed that lenalidomide maintenance can improve patients' OS, and the delayed exhaustion of CAR-T cells may contribute to this OS benefit.

Chimeric antigen receptors containing the OX40 signalling domain enhance the persistence of T cells even under repeated stimulation with multiple myeloma target cells.

Persistence of CAR-T cell function is associated with relapse rate after CAR-T therapy, while co-stimulatory agents are highly concerned with the persistence of CAR-T cells. In this study, we designed and constructed a series of BCMA-targeting second-generation CAR constructs containing CD28, 41BB, and OX40 molecules, respectively, to identify the costimulatory domains most favorable for persistence. The results of routine in vitro studies showed that OX40-CAR-T and 41BB-CAR-T had similar antitumor effects and were superior to CD28-CAR-T in terms of proliferation and cytotoxicity. Although difficult to distinguish by conventional functional assays, OX40-CAR-T cells exhibited greater proliferation and enhanced immune memory than 41BB-CAR-T cells with the repeated stimulation assay by BCMA-expressing target cells. In vivo studies further demonstrated that OX40-CAR-T cells had stronger proliferative activity than 41BB-CAR-T cells, which was highly consistent with the in vitro antitumor activity and proliferation results. Our study provides for the first time a scientific basis for designing OX40-CAR-T cell therapy to improve relapse in patients with MM after CAR-T treatment.

Efficacy and toxicity of SEAM (semustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SEAM regimen followed by auto-SCT in lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with lymphoma who underwent auto-SCT with SEAM conditioning regimen from January 2010 to June 2018 at our centre. In total, 97 patients were analysed. RESULTS: The median time to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment was 9.5 days (range, 7-15 days) and 12 days (range, 7-25 days), respectively. Grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting, mucositis and diarrhoea were observed in 21.6%, 36.1%, and 11.3% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related mortality at 100 days occurred in 2 patients (2.1%). After a median follow-up time of 53.9 months, the 3-year incidence of disease relapse or progression was 34%. The estimated progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 62% and 75%, respectively. Compared with previous studies using BEAM as the conditioning regimen, this study shows that the SEAM regimen has a comparable efficacy and safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: The SEAM regimen is feasible and might be an ideal alternative to BEAM regimen for lymphoma auto-SCT.